Why Latency, Not Partitions, Dictates Your Database's Consistency [50Week50Papper]
Confession: As someone with dyslexia, I’m definitely not a fan of long, dense academic text. Video lectures have always been my preferred way to learn. Honestly, reading research papers is something I’ve dodged for years—too much jargon, too many walls of text, and not enough clarity. But that’s exactly why I’m giving myself this challenge 50Week50Papper: I want to see how far I can go if I really stick with it, and whether pushing through helps me learn things that actually last.
My goal isn’t just to skim headlines or collect citations. I want to go deeper—reading one seminal technical whitepaper every week and really figuring out what’s inside, even if that means slowing down, re-reading, and wrestling with tough concepts.
But here’s the twist: I’m doing all this in public, right here, as a sort of open online notebook.
Why? Two big reasons:
Memory for my future self: Writing down my takeaways helps me process, organize, and actually remember what I’ve learned. Putting them out there means I can always come back later when I need a refresher.
Maybe it helps you too: If you’re an engineer, researcher, or just another tech nerd, maybe these notes will help you discover (or rediscover) some classics. Or maybe you’ll just relate to my struggle—and those occasional “aha!” moments—trying to crack technical content.
So, consider this an open journal. I’ll do my best to cut through the jargon, flag the breakthroughs, and be honest about what clicked and what didn’t.
Welcome to Week 1! And to kick things off, I picked a paper that’s sparked more conversations (and arguments!) in our world than almost any other:
Consistency Tradeoffs in Modern Distributed Database System Design by Daniel Abadi
Let's unpack that.

